Federal Trade Commission

Federal Trade Commission

Pretexting is the practice of getting your personal information under false pretenses. Pretexters sell your information to people who may use it to get credit in your name, steal your assets, or to investigate or sue you. Pretexting is against the law.

Gobierno de Jalisco

Biblioteca Virtural - Congreso del estado de Jalisco

Ley Sobre Relaciones Familiares

Leyes Mexicanas sobre la Familia

U.S. Citizenship and immigration Services

Citizenship
http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/services/natz/citizen.htm

Naturalization
http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/services/natz/index.htm

INA: ACT 301 - NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9376?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act301

INA: ACT 302 - PERSONS BORN IN PUERTO RICO
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9391?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act302

INA: ACT 303 - PERSONS BORN IN THE CANAL ZONE OR REPUBLIC OF PANAMA ON OR AFTER FEBRUARY 26, 1994
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9397?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act303

INA: ACT 304 - PERSONS BORNS IN ALASKA ON OR AFTER MARCH 30, 1867
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9406?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act304

INA: ACT 305 - PERSONS BORN IN HAWAII
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9412?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act305

INA: ACT 306 - PERSONS LIVING IN AND BORN IN THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9418?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act306

INA: ACT 307 - PERSONS LIVING IN AND BORN IN GUAM
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9430?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act307

INA: ACT 308 - NATIONALS BUT NOT CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9441?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act308

INA: ACT 309 - CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-9454?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act309

Children and Citizenship
Each year, many people adopt children from outside the U.S. For information, see our Inter-Country adoptions page and the State Department’s International Adoption page. (More information for U.S. citizens abroad is on the State Department’s website.)
The INA provides information on children and citizenship (including for those adopted abroad) in § 320 and § 322.In 2000, the U.S. Congress passed the Child Citizenship Act, which impacts the INA. The following titles will link you to information about this Act and to other relevant documents.

Child Citizenship Act Program Update, January 2004Information for Parents of Foreign-Born Children Residing Abroad, January 2004Information for Adoptive Parents of Foreign-Born Orphans Residing in the U.S., January 2004Information for Parents of Foreign-Born Biological Children Residing in the U.S., January 2004
Persons who became citizens under the previous § 320 or the repealed § 321 are still citizens even though the law that made them citizens is no longer in force. These individuals may apply for Certificates of Citizenship at any time.
The Immigration of Adopted and Prospective Adopted Children (Handbook M-249):

Text VersionPDF Version (2,580 KB)

Coragio

About Me
Name:Fr Willy Raymond, CSC Location:Hollywood, California, United States
Born in Maine, Old Town, in 1944, the eighth of 12 children, of French-Canadian parents.

View my complete profile

HECTOR L. HUERTAS, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.

LexisNexis(TM) Academic - Document: "Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(e)"

LexisNexis(TM) Academic - Document

LexisNexis(TM) Academic - Document: "On a Rule 12(c) motion, the facts are to be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party; the facts asserted in the nonmoving party's pleadings will be accepted as true; and any contradictory statements in the movant's pleadings are deemed false. Constitution Bank v. DiMarco, 815 F. Supp. 154, 157 (E.D. Pa. 1993). To prevail, the moving party must show that there are no genuine issues of fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Mele v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 359 F.3d 251, 253 (3d Cir. 2004) (citing Leamer v. Fauver, 288 F.3d 532, 535 (3d Cir. 2002)). Judgment on the pleadings is appropriate only when 'all material allegations of fact are admitted or not controverted in the pleadings [*24] and only questions of law remain to be decided by the district court.' 5C CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE � 1367."

Unlawfully Seized Property

: "The Ninth Circuit has consistently held that the fruits of an unlawful seizure, including the forfeitable item, may not be used as evidence during a forfeiture trial. United States v. $ 191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, 16 F.3d 1051, 1063 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. $ 277,700.00 in U.S. Currency, 941 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1991). The court rejected the government's argument that the money is the nominal defendant and could not be suppressed even if it was obtained as a result of an unlawful seizure, stating that precedent, logic, and common sense precluded the arguments. The court also rejected the government's assertion that INS v. Lopez-Mendoza supported its position, stating that 'an examination of the facts' indicated that the Court was not stating that an illegally seized res is admissible for its evidentiary value in a forfeiture proceeding, but merely restating the settled principle that the government can maintain an action against a defendant even if that defendant's presence was unlawfully procured. $ 191,910.00, 16 F.3d at 1063. The Ninth Circuit expressly disagreed with the dictum and holding of the Eighth and Second Circuits in $ 12,390.00 and $ 37,780.00, and noted in a footnote that 'the majority of circuits to consider the issue have agreed with the rule . . . adopted in $ 277,700.00, which requires the suppression of an illegally obtained res.' The court then cited earlier dicta by the Eighth Circuit that 'had the money in this case been sei"